It’s important that the Common Council keep pushing for cost-cutting measures within the fire department that keeps the taxpayers in mind.
The city taxpayers’ only option is to expect that management (the Common Council) is going to get the best deal out of the fire department as possible.
The task will be to examine every possibility and make a decision that cuts the OT without hiring. It’s a near impossible equation, but not impossible. It’s just not going to be easy and will take some drastic decisions.
It will also apparently take some court battles the city is willing to wage. If the city is willing to battle it out and get the best deal for the taxpayers, we’re willing to support the time it will take.
At this point, we appreciate that the fire department is meeting with the city and willing to make a deal, but they also seem totally out of touch with reality.
That’s why we’re glad to hear the Council is not ready to sign on the dotted line on anything just yet, even though one week ago the fire department thought it had a deal.
It’s incumbent on the fire department to get in the real world or things will get a lot worse. Look at what your private sector neighbors who pay your salaries are going through every day at their job, and then think about the overtime games you are playing and unrealistic demands you are making.
Feeling guilty?
Editorials
EDITORIAL: Put taxpayers before firefighters
- Editorials
-
-
‘Mailing it in’ is not good enough
The U.S. Postal Service has been mailing it in for years. It has stuck like an old postage stamp to a business model that was going nowhere fast, literally. Snail mail is still the USPS stock in trade, and it has increasingly earned its nickname. And for a poorly run operation, it certainly does cost a lot. USPS must offer competitive shipping options, guaranteed faster delivery times and overall service enhancements — or the death spiral of an American institution will continue.
-
OUR VIEW: Time for Mongielo to face the music
Town of Lockport auto repair shop owner David Mongielo has gone over the line in his violation of a town sign ordinance.
-
OUR VIEW: At dawn of New Year, a call for civility
Each new year brings with it an inherent hopefulness in our own lives and the larger world around us, this one in particular — if only because it isn’t 2011.
-
Have a safe New Year's Eve
This isn’t the Prohibition era, and we’re not into moralizing about alcohol consumption.
We have no beef about adults having a few drinks on New Year’s Eve, as long as no one else gets hurt in the process. Your choice — hangover, no hangover. Check yes or no.
But, with one very important proviso: Don’t drink and drive.
And we’re very much against hosts of a New Year’s Eve party sending their guests out to their cars when their guests have overindulged. Especially when there are safe options to avoid behavior that risks your life and that of others you may encounter on the road. -
The bus stops here
The NFTA’s proposed cuts to local bus routes have the potential to really hurt the little guy, the rider who relies on the bus to get to work, to shop, to get to the doctor’s.
It just shouldn’t happen. -
OUR VIEW: Lockport taxpayers lose again
We find it highly inappropriate that the City of Lockport — via its development corporation — is again punishing taxpayers for renovations to 57 Canal St.
-
CHEERS & JEERS
We applaud Lockport Town Court and Judge Leonard G. Tilney Jr. for recusing themselves from the driving-while-intoxicated case against local attorney Daniel E. Seaman due to conflict of interest.
-
OUR VIEW: Recharge N.Y. is a plus for us
We’re encouraged that Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s visit to Niagara County this week brings a new and improved version of the Power For Jobs program to our area.
- CHEERS & JEERS: The US&J’s view on the best and worst of the week
-
OUR VIEW: Cleanup is up the creek
New York state had an Eighteenmile Creek cleanup within its grasp — and now it’s trying to change horses in mid-stream. And that could leave the cleanup effort up the creek without a paddle.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
‘Mailing it in’ is not good enough





