It’s interesting what you’ll find on the Internet sometimes — especially on our newspaper Web site.
But lately our normally off-the-wall and sometimes obscene community discussion forum has been pretty constructive.
There’s a thread that sprung up this week following Judith Northcliffe pleaded guilty to three building code violations at 162 Monroe St., the house she owns but hasn’t lived in for some time. The comments from our web visitors have lead to a discussion on incentives that should be offered for those that improve their property.
Kudos to these web guys for creating a really good discussion.
It lead us in the newsroom to question why assessments go up on those who improve the exterior of their house, while the assessments on those who let their homes fall into disrepair are basically awarded for keeping a crappy piece of property.
It seems so obvious, reverse assessments.
If a homeowner improves their home, credit them, or lower their assessment. There needs to be incentive for those who spend hard-earned money improving their homes.
This weekend, as you start your spring makeover on your home and probably continue long into the summer, chipping away at that list that never ends, how much more motivated would you be if you knew the city would take your work into account when reassessing.
The city has a good number (and that’s being nice) of rundown properties. Many of these properties are not maintained by the absentee landlords. People rent and pay good money to live there, but the owners of these properties do nothing to keep them up. What incentive do they have to keep it up?
If they were to improve the property they are renting, not only would it be income property, but they’d be lowering the assessment and the amount owed in taxes. That’s not even mentioning the overall improvement to the neighborhood and the pride in homeownership.
Whether it’s private, one-family homes or landlords or even business owners, the idea of rewarding those who make improvements to their property needs to be considered. It’s a forward thinking idea that’s being discussed at lockportjournal.com, now we just need those at Lockport City Hall and at the county offices to discuss the same.
Tim Marren is the managing editor of the Lockport Union-Sun & Journal. Contact him at Tim.Marren@lockportjournal.com or 439-9222.
Columns
MARREN: Incentives needed for homeowners
- Columns
-
-
Gadgets Galore
The 2012 International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas has come and gone, but the gadgets introduced there likely will be part of our future for years to come. Record numbers were set with attendance, vendors, and square footage of exhibit space. Innovations were unveiled, and in some cases, expectations dashed.
-
LEFFLER: I remember the scream
If you’re sick of news of the run for the White House, I’ve got some really bad news for you: It’s about to get worse.
-
Put some Apple accessories under the tree this year
- War of 1812 has lots of connections to us
- Don’t overlook freedom
-
The scariest movies ever, in my mind
I don’t enjoy scary movies, so my list of scariest is limited. First on my list would have to be “The Wizard of Oz.” The Wicked Witch of the West gave me the creeps and so did her creepy monkeys. Margaret Hamilton was so frightening to children that Mr. Rogers invited the actress to his neighborhood, cleaned the green paint off her face and show she was really a nice person.
-
Who would have thunk, the magic of peanut butter?
If you are what you eat, I guess I was about 50 percent peanut butter as kid. Mom made great dinners for our family of 10, but I had peanut butter for breakfast and peanut butter at bedtime. We rarely ran out.
- Deciding the news is no trivial matter
- Want a treasure that’s hard to measure, take a Penney tour
-
Thought-provoking fillers can be fascinating
Before modular layout, newspaper pages were designed with a shotgun, not by page designers.
Stories were spotted all over the place by the person in the slot. We put big headlines on top tried not to bump other headlines. That way, the headlines wouldn’t run into each other. If they did, we used italic type to supplement the Roman. - More Columns Headlines
-










